| SM Relative Force Strengths |
|
|
|
“Our job in physics is to see things simply, to understand a great many complicated phenomena in a unified way, in terms of a few simple principles.” – Steven Weinberg Compared to the quantum structure of forces, environment, and matter provided by the Aether Physics Model, the Standard Model of Particle Physics is anything but simple. In the APM, there are four fundamental particles of matter (electron, proton, positron, antiproton) and two types of photons (electron/positron, and proton/antiproton). All the forces in the APM unify to the Gforce and obey simple Newtonian style force equations, all matter quantifies as primary angular momentum, and the environment quantifies as quantum rotating magnetic field. The SM loosely describes quantum structure in terms of a dozen fermions and a dozen bosons, and one type of photon. The forces explain in terms of complicated and dissimilar paradigms. Gravity equations relate curved space-time tensors to mass/energy tensors , of which neither space-time curvature nor mass/energy are believed to be physical entities. SM strong force counter-intuitively explains by imaginary particles called mesons, of which many different sizes have been “discovered.” Further, the mesons then compose from more fundamental forces named “strong color force.” Out of this has emerged the branch of physics called Quantum Chromodynamics . The so-called “weak nuclear force” does not express in terms of force, but as a dimensionless number. Yet, this dimensionless number mediates by massive particles called W± and Z bosons. In the SM, a charge presents as a point particle. The fact that a point has zero dimensions means that force exchange particles would have infinite mass if calculated by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. This not being acceptable, the force carriers of the strong and weak forces had to arbitrarily be given different structures than point particles, and thus were assigned the necessary imaginary qualities. To complicate things further, the SM only recognizes one manifestation of charge, the electrostatic (elementary) charge. Thus, electromagnetic observations incorrectly explain in terms of moving electrostatic charge. Yet, it is apparent from observations of the electron through the Zeeman effect the electron has inherent magnetic dipoles. If the electron has inherent magnetism, then how can electron magnetism be explained by moving charge when the electron is the charge carrier? To illustrate the chaos of modern theories of quantum structure, let us look at the predictions of the relative strengths of the forces as determined in the SM as compared to the Aether Physics Model. The table below represents seven different reputable sources of physics information. Each source predicts a different set of relative force strengths, and unfortunately, none of the sources reveals the exact math and method used to deduce the values.
Of particular note is the use of the electron fine structure constant as the relative strength of the electrostatic force. The relative strength of the electrostatic force is supposed to be in relation to the strong force. Since there is no mathematical or physical basis in the SM relating the electrostatic force to the strong force by way of the fine structure constant, the fine structure constant appears arbitrarily assigned. The above sources quantify the electron fine structure by its cgs units representation, which only shrouds the situation in deeper mystery. According to SM authorities, h-bar and c are merely convenience constants, having no real physical representation. Furthermore, according to the SM, all charge expresses as single dimension. There is no logic for squaring the SM elementary charge in showing the relative strength of the strong force to the electrostatic force. Many having great success in physics have touted the SM, yet no scientist has up to now unified the forces. Furthermore, each force calculates using a different method, because none of the force theories is mathematically consistent with each other. The view of charges and quantum particles as points, which dictates by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, further cripples the ability of the SM to unify the forces. For the claim of seeing complicated phenomena in a simple way, the SM is grossly disjointed, incomplete, and inconsistent in its presentation. Although the Aether Physics Model may seem complicated due to the many new paradigm shifts needed to view it, these shifts are necessary only because the SM exists as the “normal” view. The complexity of the SM is its disjointed, incomplete, and inconsistent nature. Once properly understood, the APM appears as a unified, complete description of quantum structure, and is self-consistent, making it a very simple model of physics.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SM Strengths

